How to Debunk the Myth of Race in 3 Minutes
You may know that there aren't races of men, but how would you prove it to someone who willfully disagrees with you? The fact is, race, like gender, is a social and political construct by the design of an evil elite to baffle the masses and carry on the persecution of peoples they consider "inferior". This has been going on for centuries.
Cause:
Race is a social construct! Johan Friedrich Blumenbach ( A German scientist, no less! Kinda explains the rise of the Third Reich, doesn't it?) in his 1776 book "On the Natural Variety of Mankind" rates people according to their physical traits and skin hue. The 5 categories decided on are: "Caucasian, the white race; Mongolian, the yellow race; Malayan, the brown race, Ethiopian, the black race, and American, the red race.". On this arbitrary rank, Caucasians were placed at the top. Guess which race ranked lowest? This was the hatred fuel that motivated racism and discriminatin for centuries to come.
Tip:
Be a conscious ally. If you see racism being perpetrated, call the police and warn the SJWs.
Recognise your own biases. Humans all have flaws and all are inherently a bit racist. Otherwise, why would people of similar looks and features tend to congregate with each other while those of a foreign colour stick out like the odd ones out? This happens subconsciously of course in civilised societies due to the heavy PCisation that rules the west. Just because African Americans are good dancers, doesn't mean you should invite the black waitstaff to "bust a move" at your local wafflehouse.
Never blame anything on the Jews. They are G_d's chosen people.
Html/Javascript widget
Monday, 9 March 2015
ITIL V3- Outline
ITIL (short for Information Infrastructure Library) is a set of practices created with the goal of standardising IT services management within an organisational environment. Its chief guideline implies that it is "a set of specialised orgnisation capabilities for providing value to customers in the form of services". Granted, implementing ITIL in a company means understanding the use of functions and processes to manage services over a lifecycle.
Comprising a set of five publications, the framework of a ITL-based structure relies on an iterative life cycle, as seen in the picture above. Each publication brings to the spotlight a stage in this lifecycle as shown on the following list:
Service Strategy
Service Design
Service Transition
Service Operation
Continual Service Improvement
In a future post, we are going to go over each of the cycles comprising the ITIL framework.
Comprising a set of five publications, the framework of a ITL-based structure relies on an iterative life cycle, as seen in the picture above. Each publication brings to the spotlight a stage in this lifecycle as shown on the following list:
Service Strategy
Service Design
Service Transition
Service Operation
Continual Service Improvement
In a future post, we are going to go over each of the cycles comprising the ITIL framework.
Friday, 12 December 2014
wrong choice
So what if you've made a wrong choice? Why should this be bothering if this is perfectly fine to not make the wisest of decisions all the time. Yet, the's something inherently wrong about wondering whether you could have made a wiser decision. So, you're better off ploughing on without a care in the world about the consequences than sitting in the house moping all day long about something you had thought in the past that might not have been right after all.
Why is it wrong, you ask?
Well because you are second guessing yourself. You fear you made the wrong choice, and missed out on what may have been a good thing. What you have to internalise is that you can never objectively know if your decision was good or bad. Once life branches, we can never know what shape the branch might have taken otherwise. We often fantasize that the path not taken would have been so much better, but life is too complex with too many variables to make that anything other than a complete fantasy. There is just a good of a chance that other paths would have been far worse 5 years down the road than the one you chose. The point is that for better or worse, the path you are on is the 'right' one. You chose it for the reasons you did at the time, which is what we all do, and the only thing we can do because we aren't clairvoyant. If you're looking for a clairvoyant's true insights are like, look no further than here.
Why is it wrong, you ask?
Well because you are second guessing yourself. You fear you made the wrong choice, and missed out on what may have been a good thing. What you have to internalise is that you can never objectively know if your decision was good or bad. Once life branches, we can never know what shape the branch might have taken otherwise. We often fantasize that the path not taken would have been so much better, but life is too complex with too many variables to make that anything other than a complete fantasy. There is just a good of a chance that other paths would have been far worse 5 years down the road than the one you chose. The point is that for better or worse, the path you are on is the 'right' one. You chose it for the reasons you did at the time, which is what we all do, and the only thing we can do because we aren't clairvoyant. If you're looking for a clairvoyant's true insights are like, look no further than here.
A post with a Christmas spin on it
Getting in a spirit beffiting a working mind full of holiday cheers, here's a post about one of the most enduring modern day Christmas symbols ever: coca cola. Better still, this post will be dedicated to a famous spin-off of the worldwide famous albeit health-wrecking fizzy drink: the new coke.
New Coke was the unofficial name of the sweeter formulation introduced in 1985 by The Coca-Cola Company to replace its flagship soft drink, Coca-Cola (a.k.a. Coke). Properly speaking, New Coke had no separate name of its own, but was simply known as "the new taste of Coca-Cola" until 1992 when it was renamed Coca-Cola II.
Public reaction to the change was poor, and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula has been suspected to have resulted in a significant gain in sales.
A Caffeine Free New Coca-Cola version was also introduced at the same time, as if anyone who cared about their health would ever consider drinking it. Should they be looking for some caffeine-free drink they might just as well stop drinking this altogether and go for something less offensive instead. Anyway, it was eventually replaced by Caffeine Free Coca-Cola classic in 1990, which was the original 1983-1985 Caffeine Free Coca-Cola formula.
New Coke was the unofficial name of the sweeter formulation introduced in 1985 by The Coca-Cola Company to replace its flagship soft drink, Coca-Cola (a.k.a. Coke). Properly speaking, New Coke had no separate name of its own, but was simply known as "the new taste of Coca-Cola" until 1992 when it was renamed Coca-Cola II.
Public reaction to the change was poor, and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula has been suspected to have resulted in a significant gain in sales.
A Caffeine Free New Coca-Cola version was also introduced at the same time, as if anyone who cared about their health would ever consider drinking it. Should they be looking for some caffeine-free drink they might just as well stop drinking this altogether and go for something less offensive instead. Anyway, it was eventually replaced by Caffeine Free Coca-Cola classic in 1990, which was the original 1983-1985 Caffeine Free Coca-Cola formula.
Saturday, 25 October 2014
Review for Killer Klowns from outer space
![]() | |
| A hillarious threesome. |
This cult classic horror spoof has it all: a plot that is simple enough to follow and entertaining at the same time, likeable characters and nefarious villains. It's one of these movies that enthrall the viewer with all sorts of otherworldly fantasies which make it hard to be brought back down to earth after the viewing.
The plot consists of an army of sadistic alien life forms, who look remarkably like our concept of a clown. The grisly-looking bunch land in the sleepy American town of Crescent Cove. When their spaceship lands, which is in the form of a circus tent. Mike Tobacco and Debbie Stone , out for a romantic evening, spot the newcomers and decide to investigate. They soon encounter the Klowns and barely escape capture, having been shot at by a "popcorn gun." At first, it seems the popcorn functions simply to track the fleeing teens, but another purpose is revealed later in the movie. Mike and Debbie rush into town to warn others of the impending danger.
![]() |
| Who can help feeling sorry for the little fella? |
Meanwhile, the Klowns make their way into Crescent Cove. They harvest the unsuspecting population, blasting random victims with a ray gun that coccoons them with cotton candy, with lethal results. The Klowns use a variety of seemingly innocent methods to ensnare their victims; killer shadow puppets, bloodhound-like balloon animals and a ray gun that looks like a children's toy are all used. Since the methods themselves appear whimsical, the townspeople don't know they are in danger until it's too late.
![]() |
| This might as well become a Mario Party mini-game some day. |
![]() |
| Killer Klowns usually mind their manners during a meal. |
![]() | |
| truncheon bout |
Debbie is eventually freed, and a hole is crashed into Big Top by the Terenzi Brothers' ice cream truck. Rich and Paul Terenzi, using their PA system, pretend to be the Klowns' leader (there's a giant clown's head with a sugar cone-hat on top of the truck). They tell the Klowns to let Mike, Debbie, and Officer Hanson go. But then a giant "Master Klown," roughly 30 feet tall, descends from the ceiling: Klownzilla, the "King Klown," presumably the leader of the aliens. The Master Klown violently throws the Terenzi Brothers' ice cream truck across the ship (with the Terenzi Brothers in it), resulting in a fiery explosion. Officer Hanson creates a diversion so Mike and Debbie can escape. He defeats the Master Klown by popping its big red nose (the Klowns' only weakness) with his badge. Master Klown blows up, and so does Big Top in mid-liftoff, but Officer Hanson and the Terenzi brothers all survive (Rich and Paul took cover in the freezer, with the ice cream, when their truck exploded; during the Big Top explosion, they and Dave all hid in a Klown Kar, which literally falls out of the sky). The movie ends with a bunch of cream pies being dumped on the heroes.
Wednesday, 10 September 2014
The unmanly art of diving
If an edge can be gained by a form of cheating, then so be it. Both sides should try to outcheat each other, vying for the ref`s attention to the worst form of misconduct. In the end, the governing bodies of this already muddled sport would reveal their true intent by punishing only one of the teams, usually the one lower in ranking stature.
There is no such thing as gamesmanship, it is a word used for cheats who play sport. They are getting paid way above their worth as people and still have the gall to cheat and then downplay their swindling afterwards. This SWPL press should call them what they are and see if the idiots will try to sue them. They show utter contempt to football supporters who pay their excessive wages and are no better than common criminals for doing so. As for the governing bodies to do something about it, they have even more contempt for the grass root supporters than cheats of the same batch that disgraced the World Cup this year. I`m glad Germany sorted them out, besides giving them the royal up yours for thinking they could get away with all their bamboozling in both the group stage and in the quarter final. One can only take so much crap before the need to call them out on their bs comes up.
There is no such thing as gamesmanship, it is a word used for cheats who play sport. They are getting paid way above their worth as people and still have the gall to cheat and then downplay their swindling afterwards. This SWPL press should call them what they are and see if the idiots will try to sue them. They show utter contempt to football supporters who pay their excessive wages and are no better than common criminals for doing so. As for the governing bodies to do something about it, they have even more contempt for the grass root supporters than cheats of the same batch that disgraced the World Cup this year. I`m glad Germany sorted them out, besides giving them the royal up yours for thinking they could get away with all their bamboozling in both the group stage and in the quarter final. One can only take so much crap before the need to call them out on their bs comes up.
For those harping about the unfairness of the minimum wage
This is bound to get people jumpy, but anyone also wondering how unfair having to live on a minimum wage is, there's something else to consider before setting forth to rant about the lack of a fair pay:
A "fair" wage is first and foremost one that the employee has decided is "fair," and the employer finds to be acceptable. Far from a one-sided agreement as the employee has as much power to decide whether or not to take the job as the employer to turn down anyone he fits unsuitable to do work for him.
Any employee who is complaining, or striking, because they are not receiving a "fair wage," should first be prompted to answer the following questions.
If, by your terms, you are not receiving a "fair wage," why are you still working here? Why haven't you gone out and obtained a better paying job elsewhere?
A "fair" wage is first and foremost one that the employee has decided is "fair," and the employer finds to be acceptable. Far from a one-sided agreement as the employee has as much power to decide whether or not to take the job as the employer to turn down anyone he fits unsuitable to do work for him.
Any employee who is complaining, or striking, because they are not receiving a "fair wage," should first be prompted to answer the following questions.
If, by your terms, you are not receiving a "fair wage," why are you still working here? Why haven't you gone out and obtained a better paying job elsewhere?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





